WebFeb 23, 2024 · 2. \author is defined by the document class, but normally authors are separated by \and or by using multiple \author commands, depending on what the class defines. – David Carlisle. Feb 23, 2024 at 15:42. @DavidCarlisle @egreg We are using the article document class and only the last \author is shown if we have multiple of them. Web2 2.2. Contact Details This page is to contain: • running head (shortened title) • title • author(s) • affiliation(s) • full address for correspondence, telephone and faxnumbers, …
LaTeX: Multiple authors stays on same line - Stack Exchange
WebSep 5, 2015 · You can probably find several examples like this just by surveying (the first page of) current research articles. So I'd suggest using an author footnote on the first page that includes the pertinent information. Use your current contact information and use the footnote to briefly mention the role played by other institutions and grants. WebJan 12, 2016 · 2. I found the way to solve this problem. An alternative ordering can be forced by including a list of \affiliation commands before the first \author in the desired order. Then use the exact same text for each affiliation when specifying them for each author. \affiliation {affiliation3} \affiliation {affiliation4} \affiliation {affiliation1 ... error in matlabrc line 189
Defining authorship in your research paper - Author Services
WebA way around that is adding a note saying "these authors contributed equally", such that the first two authors are recognized as co-first. Co-second (and so on) is just the generalization to the next set of authors. They're all co-authors, as that term is more inclusive, and doesn't say anything about contribution level. WebApr 16, 2024 · Mentioning your affiliation in a paper. In nearly all published papers, affiliations of their authors are given after their names but before the abstract. The … WebApr 28, 2015 · The question I sent to PLOS ONE: According to your submission guidelines "Each author on the list must have an affiliation". However an author has made substantial contribution while not been related to any institutional or professional affiliation. Is it okay to include "Independent Researcher" as an afilliation in this case? error in logistic regression